Australia v. Pakistan. 2 Tests.
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
Good article by Greg Baum
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket ... 53cwq.html
2 wickets were defintely not out with the two Australian bowlers not having any part of their foot / heel behind the line
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket ... 53cwq.html
2 wickets were defintely not out with the two Australian bowlers not having any part of their foot / heel behind the line
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
As reported on Nick's on September 7 :Pies4shaw wrote:...
In some sad news, I heard in the commentary that the great leggie, Abdul Qadir passed away recently. He was 63. I think he was one of Warnie’s favourites, growing up.
http://magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.ph ... 70#1931570
Originally, I just watched the dismissal deliveries but I went back and watched the 6th wicket follow up commentary after I read your post. It was marginal but I didn’t mind the call: he was either just on or just behind the line and, watching the repeated replays, it’s understandable why the video ump reached the decision he did. It wasn’t a clear and obvious one, in my view. Provided the umpires are consistent about that over the series, that call was fine by me. I haven’t got any comment on the other one because I don’t know which it was.watt price tully wrote:Good article by Greg Baum
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket ... 53cwq.html
2 wickets were defintely not out with the two Australian bowlers not having any part of their foot / heel behind the line