2022 Trade Period. (COMPLETED)
Moderator: bbmods
I have no doubt that is the plan and fixing the salary cap has enabled us to be players in the free agency market.RudeBoy wrote:We are still missing an important link in our Premiership team - a genuine star CHF. Hopefully, now that we've corrected our salary cap, we can go after one next year.
Wrighty is doing a great job.
- Side By Side -
- tbaker
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:51 am
- Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG
Wright had said at the start of the trade period that gaining Mitchell was unlikely. It seems that Mitchell would've cost a lot more (in picks or $$) if Geelong didn't offer up their player as part of the Henry/Mitchell trade.duggieboy wrote:Thanks DTM for posting Wrighty's post trade interview.
Interesting he said they weren't going to let Henry go, but something happened late in the piece around the Mitchell situation which changed the thinking.
Did I interpret this right? - maybe someone here can interpret better what he's saying with this.
I thought we'd been looking at Mitchell for ages?
I find your lack of faith disturbing
- uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
- Posts: 4929
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:43 pm
- Location: Under negotiation
How did Jake write this with a straight face and avoid “cheating” and “rort”? Bold text
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/cat ... 5bpcj.html
Normally, a team at the head of the ladder would not have the salary cap room to pull off the once-in-a-decade heist of recruiting Jack Bowes and pick seven in exchange for picking up a heavily back-loaded Gold Coast contract.
That they won the auction for Bowes was a measure of Geelong’s unmatched capacity to: a) pay players less than their rivals; and b) sell their wares to players. Bowes chose the Cats when he might have gone to Essendon or Hawthorn, clubs where one would think he would be more assured of a game.
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/cat ... 5bpcj.html
Normally, a team at the head of the ladder would not have the salary cap room to pull off the once-in-a-decade heist of recruiting Jack Bowes and pick seven in exchange for picking up a heavily back-loaded Gold Coast contract.
That they won the auction for Bowes was a measure of Geelong’s unmatched capacity to: a) pay players less than their rivals; and b) sell their wares to players. Bowes chose the Cats when he might have gone to Essendon or Hawthorn, clubs where one would think he would be more assured of a game.
-
- Posts: 2262
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 93 times
True. As much as I hate the attitude towards the club that recruited and nurtured them, I have always said that Collingwood must have players who want to be there and are not biding their time to piss off to another club of their choice. We have done well. Now it’s up to the players to perform up to their potential and ability and deliver us the success we yearn for.masoncox wrote:This in a nut shell.What'sinaname wrote:Hard to be disappointed.
Tall forward, tall backman, midfielder and quick small forward. Filled four needs.
We lost a ruckman (one of three) and an under-sized tall forward who was playing VFL.
We got what we needed
I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm
- Skids
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:46 am
- Location: ANZAC day 2019 with Dad.
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 44 times
Just to add; Frampton - 2.00m tall & 90kgBazBoy wrote:The variety of the four experienced ins
Frampton a big athletic defender
McStay a big big forward/ ruck
Hill a crafty small goal kicker
Tich a clearance beast
McStay - 1.97m & 98kg
Exactly what is required. Could this be one of our best trade periods?
Don't count the days, make the days count.
- Presti35
- Posts: 19896
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has liked: 437 times
- Been liked: 209 times
Will keep an eye on Fiorini. We were heavily linked to him and we pulled the pin. He has one year to go on his contract with the Suns.
Sam Hayes was a ruck we were linked to very early on. Noting eventuated here as the trade period began.
We got everyone else we wanted and were linked to. We improved our draft hand. We lost Grundy which we knew was coming (The contract is GONE!!) and we lost Henry which was unfortunate, but is it really a surprise to anyone?
Sam Hayes was a ruck we were linked to very early on. Noting eventuated here as the trade period began.
We got everyone else we wanted and were linked to. We improved our draft hand. We lost Grundy which we knew was coming (The contract is GONE!!) and we lost Henry which was unfortunate, but is it really a surprise to anyone?
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
- MatthewBoydFanClub
- Posts: 5559
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Elwood
- Been liked: 1 time
Fiorini is an excellent VFL player. We already have players like him at Collingwood. Poulter is better than him in my opinion. Sam Hayes is a slow plodding ruckman. Why would we need him, apart from him being big? Frampton is also an excellent SANFL footballer, but unlike Fiorini, we don't have any of his type at Collingwood and at 25 his best football is ahead of him. Bobby Hill is the leg speed in our forward line we missed when Stephenson himself went missing (and finished at North). Mitchell is an out and out star at the center bounces. I don't think anybody is entitled to criticize his disposal given we have Adams in the side. We lose most of Grundy's contract enabling us to chase a genuine star next year. All in all you couldn't have wished for a better trade haul from this year. People are applauding Geelong for their trade haul - what they got is a player I don't rate (Bowes) who comes with a huge contract, an unproven player (Bruhn) and a sook (Henry) and lose one of their greatest ever players (Selwood).
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20101
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 30 times
Plus we have 3 picks inside the first 30.masoncox wrote:This in a nut shell.What'sinaname wrote:Hard to be disappointed.
Tall forward, tall backman, midfielder and quick small forward. Filled four needs.
We lost a ruckman (one of three) and an under-sized tall forward who was playing VFL.
We got what we needed
What's not to love!!
-
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
- Has liked: 70 times
- Been liked: 52 times
- thesoretoothsayer
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:15 am
- Been liked: 23 times
Yeah, looks like it.BazBoy wrote:I believe/ suspect Ollie was leaving for Geelong the day he donned the famous
#35
Whilst I'm pissed off at Henry for wasting our time, I do recall that Anthony Rocca was always going to come to Collingwood. So you win some, you lose some.
On the plus side, I don't need to watch Henry lolling around, with his hands on his hips, in a Collingwood guernsey any longer.